<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Tech Socio Tech - Latest Comments in Watch It</title><link>http://techsociotech.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://techsociotech.disqus.com/watch_it/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 11:05:02 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Watch It</title><link>http://www.techsociotech.com/2009/04/watch-it.html#comment-7881732</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Chris, that 'Is it broken?' connotation of the gesture is exactly why I think the device should not be designed such that you get to be seen holding it to your ear with strap and all. Who wants to be seen constantly checking whether their expensive tech is broken or not?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FJ!!</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 11:05:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Watch It</title><link>http://www.techsociotech.com/2009/04/watch-it.html#comment-7879604</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;not only is holding a wrist to the ear very uncomfortable, it also looks stupid. And taking the watch, strap and all, and holding that your ear? No.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When I was a lad, I went to sea.....no, when I was a lad, watches mostly had springs and movements inside and you wound them up once a week or so. If the watch looked like it was stopped, you held it to your ear for a second to see if it was still ticking.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;How times change...how time(pieces) change...&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 07:52:38 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>